<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Judicial Activists&#8217;? Look to the Right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gedblog.com/2009/05/27/judicial-activists-look-to-the-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gedblog.com/2009/05/27/judicial-activists-look-to-the-right/</link>
	<description>A day in the life of me.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:47:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ged</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2009/05/27/judicial-activists-look-to-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-15615</link>
		<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 12:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/?p=1264#comment-15615</guid>
		<description>&quot;since the right cannot stop her nomination, why even waste time on hearings and a confirmation vote?&quot;

While a big part of me is tempted to agree and say &quot;Yes, why not?&quot; I think it&#039;s important for the Senate to do their job and enter into some debate about her positions on important legal findings. There is nothing inherently wrong with this process although I suspect much of it is really political theater than anything else.

This goes double for the GOP who need to show their base that they&#039;re not simply rolling over for Obama. People like Newt, Rush and Tancredo are making doubly sure of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;since the right cannot stop her nomination, why even waste time on hearings and a confirmation vote?&#8221;</p>
<p>While a big part of me is tempted to agree and say &#8220;Yes, why not?&#8221; I think it&#8217;s important for the Senate to do their job and enter into some debate about her positions on important legal findings. There is nothing inherently wrong with this process although I suspect much of it is really political theater than anything else.</p>
<p>This goes double for the GOP who need to show their base that they&#8217;re not simply rolling over for Obama. People like Newt, Rush and Tancredo are making doubly sure of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bean</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2009/05/27/judicial-activists-look-to-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-15613</link>
		<dc:creator>bean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 12:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/?p=1264#comment-15613</guid>
		<description>oh, and judge sotomayor? i wrote sen. burr with a simple statement. since the right cannot stop her nomination, why even waste time on hearings and a confirmation vote?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, and judge sotomayor? i wrote sen. burr with a simple statement. since the right cannot stop her nomination, why even waste time on hearings and a confirmation vote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bean</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2009/05/27/judicial-activists-look-to-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-15612</link>
		<dc:creator>bean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 12:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/?p=1264#comment-15612</guid>
		<description>like you say ged, obama was the victor. America is firmly in the hands of the democrat party. all that is in America is now democrat controlled. 
 unemployment at 10%, 12% of homes delinquent or in foreclosure, gdp fell nearly 6% last quarter,and of course this:
 &quot;According to USA today, Obama increased the Nationl Debt some $6 TRILLION dollars so far this year.  Each American family&#039;s share of the US debt is now over half a million dollars.   Here&#039;s a link:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-05-28-debt_N.htm

Thats more than the value of the average person&#039;s home, cars, savings, and retirement accounts combined.

 This is money the US government has borrowed to bail out detroit, wall street, state governments, the war in iraq, ethanol subsidies, windmill subsidies, paying farmers not to farm, recession stimulus, and so on.

 Do you want even MORE debt?   How does Obama plan to pay for nationalized health care?
http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-264409
  
 his reasoning is not hard to figure out ged. if we all can&#039;t be equally rich, then we&#039;ll all be equally poor.
 yep, elections have consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like you say ged, obama was the victor. America is firmly in the hands of the democrat party. all that is in America is now democrat controlled.<br />
 unemployment at 10%, 12% of homes delinquent or in foreclosure, gdp fell nearly 6% last quarter,and of course this:<br />
 &#8220;According to USA today, Obama increased the Nationl Debt some $6 TRILLION dollars so far this year.  Each American family&#8217;s share of the US debt is now over half a million dollars.   Here&#8217;s a link:<br />
<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-05-28-debt_N.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-05-28-debt_N.htm</a></p>
<p>Thats more than the value of the average person&#8217;s home, cars, savings, and retirement accounts combined.</p>
<p> This is money the US government has borrowed to bail out detroit, wall street, state governments, the war in iraq, ethanol subsidies, windmill subsidies, paying farmers not to farm, recession stimulus, and so on.</p>
<p> Do you want even MORE debt?   How does Obama plan to pay for nationalized health care?<br />
<a href="http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-264409" rel="nofollow">http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-264409</a></p>
<p> his reasoning is not hard to figure out ged. if we all can&#8217;t be equally rich, then we&#8217;ll all be equally poor.<br />
 yep, elections have consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Maletic</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2009/05/27/judicial-activists-look-to-the-right/comment-page-1/#comment-15513</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Maletic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/?p=1264#comment-15513</guid>
		<description>If you disagree with a judge, they&#039;re activist. If you agree, they&#039;re prudent and restrained. The term &quot;activist judge&quot; lost its meaning after being co-opted by the right a few years back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you disagree with a judge, they&#8217;re activist. If you agree, they&#8217;re prudent and restrained. The term &#8220;activist judge&#8221; lost its meaning after being co-opted by the right a few years back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

