<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcast To Oblivion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/</link>
	<description>A day in the life of me.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:51:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Christiansen</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/comment-page-1/#comment-12487</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Christiansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/#comment-12487</guid>
		<description>And, wow, just noticed this is a year old post that I got linked to. Well, so much for keeping the conversation going…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, wow, just noticed this is a year old post that I got linked to. Well, so much for keeping the conversation going…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Christiansen</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/comment-page-1/#comment-12486</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Christiansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/#comment-12486</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post. I create the podcasts for User Interface Engineering. Without sounding like an ad, we have three series of podcasts, one, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/topics/podcasts/userability/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Userability&lt;/a&gt;, is a one-guest call-in show that is about 10 minutes in length. One is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/topics/podcasts/usability-tools-podcast/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Usability Tools Podcast&lt;/a&gt;, in which we attempt to discuss a design method or tool in about 30 mins, and one, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/topics/podcasts/spoolcast/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SpoolCast&lt;/a&gt; where we interview someone involved in design that&#039;s typically in the 45 minute range. 

According to our download stats, one length is not preferred more than another (of course, we can&#039;t tell what gets listened to once it&#039;s downloaded), and on-site plays are also pretty equal. We have conducted surveys of our users, and in our case the people are evenly split between hoping each show fits in their average commute (~30) and not caring at all because they just pause and resume later. For the record, I edit every episode extensively, so it&#039;s only as long as it needs to be. But I don&#039;t assign arbitrary time constraints.

Personally, I don&#039;t care about length in the podcasts I listen to. I&#039;m with Dan Benjamin (whose two podcasts I enjoy) actually like them being longer than my commute… it&#039;s like having multiple episodes to listen to each week. But there&#039;s a key point here: the podcast is either interesting or it isn&#039;t. If it&#039;s interesting, I&#039;ll listen to it in 3-4 stints. If it&#039;s not, I&#039;ll turn it off as soon as I&#039;ve established that. FWIW, I listen to MBW and the longer it is, typically, the happier I am. (I do fast forward commercials when they go on for five minutes, which has begun to happen recently. I think Leo needs to address that.)

I think the beauty of podcasting is that it doesn&#039;t have to have arbitrary time constraints. Cover one full topic and stop. Cover three… I don&#039;t think it matters. What matters is that you talk to and please your audience. This is what works for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post. I create the podcasts for User Interface Engineering. Without sounding like an ad, we have three series of podcasts, one, <a href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/topics/podcasts/userability/" rel="nofollow">Userability</a>, is a one-guest call-in show that is about 10 minutes in length. One is the <a href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/topics/podcasts/usability-tools-podcast/" rel="nofollow">Usability Tools Podcast</a>, in which we attempt to discuss a design method or tool in about 30 mins, and one, the <a href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/topics/podcasts/spoolcast/" rel="nofollow">SpoolCast</a> where we interview someone involved in design that&#8217;s typically in the 45 minute range. </p>
<p>According to our download stats, one length is not preferred more than another (of course, we can&#8217;t tell what gets listened to once it&#8217;s downloaded), and on-site plays are also pretty equal. We have conducted surveys of our users, and in our case the people are evenly split between hoping each show fits in their average commute (~30) and not caring at all because they just pause and resume later. For the record, I edit every episode extensively, so it&#8217;s only as long as it needs to be. But I don&#8217;t assign arbitrary time constraints.</p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t care about length in the podcasts I listen to. I&#8217;m with Dan Benjamin (whose two podcasts I enjoy) actually like them being longer than my commute… it&#8217;s like having multiple episodes to listen to each week. But there&#8217;s a key point here: the podcast is either interesting or it isn&#8217;t. If it&#8217;s interesting, I&#8217;ll listen to it in 3-4 stints. If it&#8217;s not, I&#8217;ll turn it off as soon as I&#8217;ve established that. FWIW, I listen to MBW and the longer it is, typically, the happier I am. (I do fast forward commercials when they go on for five minutes, which has begun to happen recently. I think Leo needs to address that.)</p>
<p>I think the beauty of podcasting is that it doesn&#8217;t have to have arbitrary time constraints. Cover one full topic and stop. Cover three… I don&#8217;t think it matters. What matters is that you talk to and please your audience. This is what works for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flickr video &#124; Kaylow</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/comment-page-1/#comment-2381</link>
		<dc:creator>Flickr video &#124; Kaylow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 03:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/#comment-2381</guid>
		<description>[...] Also consider a brief video that offers insight or supplements a set (I now wish I had a quick clip of the Red Sox victory parade I attended last year). Also, as John Gruber said, the time limitation encourages creativity and brevity. As we know, editing &#8212; cutting out the crap &#8212; is good. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also consider a brief video that offers insight or supplements a set (I now wish I had a quick clip of the Red Sox victory parade I attended last year). Also, as John Gruber said, the time limitation encourages creativity and brevity. As we know, editing &#8212; cutting out the crap &#8212; is good. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Secret of the Wednesday&#8217;s Haul &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-04-08</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/comment-page-1/#comment-2376</link>
		<dc:creator>The Secret of the Wednesday&#8217;s Haul &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-04-08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 08:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/#comment-2376</guid>
		<description>[...] gedblog » Blog Archive » Podcast To Oblivion (tags: podcasts) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gedblog » Blog Archive » Podcast To Oblivion (tags: podcasts) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/comment-page-1/#comment-2357</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/#comment-2357</guid>
		<description>Good job, Ged. I&#039;d just ad &quot;Abandon your intro music.&quot; I can&#039;t stand podcasts with intro music that goes on and on. Yes, we all know you have GaraBand with the fun little jingles. Very nice.

That&#039;s something I love about The Talk Show. They just start talking from the very first second. Podcasters needn&#039;t use radio or television as models for how a &quot;show&quot; ought to be formatted. I think that&#039;s a difficult realization for a lot of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job, Ged. I&#8217;d just ad &#8220;Abandon your intro music.&#8221; I can&#8217;t stand podcasts with intro music that goes on and on. Yes, we all know you have GaraBand with the fun little jingles. Very nice.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s something I love about The Talk Show. They just start talking from the very first second. Podcasters needn&#8217;t use radio or television as models for how a &#8220;show&#8221; ought to be formatted. I think that&#8217;s a difficult realization for a lot of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Miller</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/comment-page-1/#comment-2356</link>
		<dc:creator>David Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/#comment-2356</guid>
		<description>Playing Devil&#039;s advocate as I like to do, radio shows like &quot;Wait, Wait...&quot; and &quot;Science Friday&quot; port over well as podcasts since they need to be of a certain length for the radio.  Also, they have experienced editing people to trim as needed (as you know from attending the &quot;Wait, Wait...&quot; taping).  Most podcasters are basically running the whole show themselves.

Having said that, I usually don&#039;t listen to podcasts that last more than an hour.  They tend to ramble on and generally don&#039;t follow a set format.  It&#039;s definitely frustrating to listen to them.  FWIW, I think most podcasters would appreciate any feedback especially if they&#039;re new to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Playing Devil&#8217;s advocate as I like to do, radio shows like &#8220;Wait, Wait&#8230;&#8221; and &#8220;Science Friday&#8221; port over well as podcasts since they need to be of a certain length for the radio.  Also, they have experienced editing people to trim as needed (as you know from attending the &#8220;Wait, Wait&#8230;&#8221; taping).  Most podcasters are basically running the whole show themselves.</p>
<p>Having said that, I usually don&#8217;t listen to podcasts that last more than an hour.  They tend to ramble on and generally don&#8217;t follow a set format.  It&#8217;s definitely frustrating to listen to them.  FWIW, I think most podcasters would appreciate any feedback especially if they&#8217;re new to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Three cheers for editing &#124; Kaylow</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/comment-page-1/#comment-2355</link>
		<dc:creator>Three cheers for editing &#124; Kaylow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/#comment-2355</guid>
		<description>[...] has written a great post about the trend towards lengthy podcasts. It&#8217;s been bothering me for a while, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has written a great post about the trend towards lengthy podcasts. It&#8217;s been bothering me for a while, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/comment-page-1/#comment-2354</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/#comment-2354</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a weirdo.

I very much prefer longer podcasts (I&#039;m really digging the expanding MBW) - but this is wholly down to they way I listen.

I listen to podcasts exclusivley in the car, and basically for entertainment rather than edification.  Since I spend a whole lot of time sitting in traffic, the longer (but entertaining) ones are good for me...

Fascinating post, though, and it points out that I am pretty unusual in this :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a weirdo.</p>
<p>I very much prefer longer podcasts (I&#8217;m really digging the expanding MBW) &#8211; but this is wholly down to they way I listen.</p>
<p>I listen to podcasts exclusivley in the car, and basically for entertainment rather than edification.  Since I spend a whole lot of time sitting in traffic, the longer (but entertaining) ones are good for me&#8230;</p>
<p>Fascinating post, though, and it points out that I am pretty unusual in this <img src='http://gedblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ged</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/comment-page-1/#comment-2352</link>
		<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/#comment-2352</guid>
		<description>&quot;I also should mention that our last episode was 6 minutes in length. Call us men of extremes if you will.&quot;

Yeah it was great except I consider it to be more of a &quot;clip show&quot; as it were. That&#039;s why I didn&#039;t include it in the graph of The Talk Show&#039;s length. If it had been new content and not culled from parts of episode 17 then it would have worked in your favor. 

I too use the pause button on long podcasts Dan, but when they are going on 1.5-2 hours, and I have to keep coming back to them over and over to get through it, I feel like I&#039;ve been listening for days and not minutes. That&#039;s when I lose patience and say buh-bye.

Anyway, thanks for commenting, it&#039;s appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I also should mention that our last episode was 6 minutes in length. Call us men of extremes if you will.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah it was great except I consider it to be more of a &#8220;clip show&#8221; as it were. That&#8217;s why I didn&#8217;t include it in the graph of The Talk Show&#8217;s length. If it had been new content and not culled from parts of episode 17 then it would have worked in your favor. </p>
<p>I too use the pause button on long podcasts Dan, but when they are going on 1.5-2 hours, and I have to keep coming back to them over and over to get through it, I feel like I&#8217;ve been listening for days and not minutes. That&#8217;s when I lose patience and say buh-bye.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for commenting, it&#8217;s appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/comment-page-1/#comment-2350</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/2008/04/04/podcast-to-oblivion/#comment-2350</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the perceptive analysis, Ged. As the host of a somewhat freeform/call-in show, I also feel the duration problem creeping up on us. The challenge in editing down that sort of program is keeping introductions and welcomes intact while losing the dross.

Then again, doing the show live means that in some respects we&#039;re not as focused on the after-show listeners as we could be.

Much to think about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the perceptive analysis, Ged. As the host of a somewhat freeform/call-in show, I also feel the duration problem creeping up on us. The challenge in editing down that sort of program is keeping introductions and welcomes intact while losing the dross.</p>
<p>Then again, doing the show live means that in some respects we&#8217;re not as focused on the after-show listeners as we could be.</p>
<p>Much to think about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
