<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design Disconnects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gedblog.com/2008/03/14/design-disconnects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gedblog.com/2008/03/14/design-disconnects/</link>
	<description>A day in the life of me.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 16:08:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: C Merrill</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2008/03/14/design-disconnects/comment-page-1/#comment-2069</link>
		<dc:creator>C Merrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/2008/03/14/design-disconnects/#comment-2069</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s intended to dis-associate the character from the actor. I think it would be harder to get absorbed in the story if you&#039;re consciously watching Tommy Lee Jones instead of Sheriff Tom Bell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s intended to dis-associate the character from the actor. I think it would be harder to get absorbed in the story if you&#8217;re consciously watching Tommy Lee Jones instead of Sheriff Tom Bell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: verybigjen</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2008/03/14/design-disconnects/comment-page-1/#comment-2044</link>
		<dc:creator>verybigjen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 03:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/2008/03/14/design-disconnects/#comment-2044</guid>
		<description>yeah I was just gonna say, they do that a TON with the names. You&#039;ll start to notice it now. Like crazy.

I think it&#039;s a way to equalize billing too since A&#039;s name is first but C&#039;s face is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah I was just gonna say, they do that a TON with the names. You&#8217;ll start to notice it now. Like crazy.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a way to equalize billing too since A&#8217;s name is first but C&#8217;s face is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ged</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2008/03/14/design-disconnects/comment-page-1/#comment-2031</link>
		<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/2008/03/14/design-disconnects/#comment-2031</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the links Louie, but in my opinion these examples are not the same as what I&#039;m talking about. I mentioned that the order of the names is probably dictated by the movies studios, I get that. 

The Dream Girls poster doesn&#039;t show anyone&#039;s face, and the names are placed far, far away from the silhouettes as well making them not visually associated with the figure above. They are not trying to show Jamie Foxx, Knowles and Murphy here.

As for the pirates poster, the images in question are not symmetrical and so it would be much more difficult for the designer to place the actor&#039;s photo above their name. It&#039;s also obvious that legally, Depp&#039;s name must have first billing, but the designer wanted his character to be the central focus of the poster, hence he&#039;s the biggest of the four. You also want Knightly&#039;s face near Bloom&#039;s since they are romantically involved together in the story, and so the designer was forced to place these two next to each other on the right leaving Rush alone on the left.

All of this doesn&#039;t apply to the No Country artwork. Bardem isn&#039;t billed first, he&#039;s billed second and so the designer was able to make his character the focus of the box by placing him in the middle. It would have been a simple matter for the designer to simply horizontally flip the two images of Brolin and Jones, and yet this didn&#039;t happen. Why?

I highly doubt the studios had such specific rules as saying &quot;So and so&#039;s name must appear first, but his image must be third&quot;. That seems highly illogical. I know there are lots of examples where this kind of out-of-order layout is standard, but my point is with No Country, it didn&#039;t have to be that way. Seems like someone was lazy to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the links Louie, but in my opinion these examples are not the same as what I&#8217;m talking about. I mentioned that the order of the names is probably dictated by the movies studios, I get that. </p>
<p>The Dream Girls poster doesn&#8217;t show anyone&#8217;s face, and the names are placed far, far away from the silhouettes as well making them not visually associated with the figure above. They are not trying to show Jamie Foxx, Knowles and Murphy here.</p>
<p>As for the pirates poster, the images in question are not symmetrical and so it would be much more difficult for the designer to place the actor&#8217;s photo above their name. It&#8217;s also obvious that legally, Depp&#8217;s name must have first billing, but the designer wanted his character to be the central focus of the poster, hence he&#8217;s the biggest of the four. You also want Knightly&#8217;s face near Bloom&#8217;s since they are romantically involved together in the story, and so the designer was forced to place these two next to each other on the right leaving Rush alone on the left.</p>
<p>All of this doesn&#8217;t apply to the No Country artwork. Bardem isn&#8217;t billed first, he&#8217;s billed second and so the designer was able to make his character the focus of the box by placing him in the middle. It would have been a simple matter for the designer to simply horizontally flip the two images of Brolin and Jones, and yet this didn&#8217;t happen. Why?</p>
<p>I highly doubt the studios had such specific rules as saying &#8220;So and so&#8217;s name must appear first, but his image must be third&#8221;. That seems highly illogical. I know there are lots of examples where this kind of out-of-order layout is standard, but my point is with No Country, it didn&#8217;t have to be that way. Seems like someone was lazy to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louie Mantia</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2008/03/14/design-disconnects/comment-page-1/#comment-2026</link>
		<dc:creator>Louie Mantia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/2008/03/14/design-disconnects/#comment-2026</guid>
		<description>The names don&#039;t have to do with the faces, I&#039;ve seen this before, but it&#039;s because of the billing.  The billing is based on the actors, and their agents, and who claims the first spot, might have to do with payment too...

Example: http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/statusainthood/dreamgirls.jpg

I would hope that third woman is NOT Eddie Murphy. :\

Example 2: http://images.art.com/images/products/regular/10106000/10106388.jpg

This one is all messed up. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The names don&#8217;t have to do with the faces, I&#8217;ve seen this before, but it&#8217;s because of the billing.  The billing is based on the actors, and their agents, and who claims the first spot, might have to do with payment too&#8230;</p>
<p>Example: <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/statusainthood/dreamgirls.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/statusainthood/dreamgirls.jpg</a></p>
<p>I would hope that third woman is NOT Eddie Murphy. :\</p>
<p>Example 2: <a href="http://images.art.com/images/products/regular/10106000/10106388.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://images.art.com/images/products/regular/10106000/10106388.jpg</a></p>
<p>This one is all messed up. <img src='http://gedblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
