<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Real Thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gedblog.com/2007/07/22/the-real-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gedblog.com/2007/07/22/the-real-thing/</link>
	<description>A day in the life of me.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 03:07:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: januarys</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2007/07/22/the-real-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>januarys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/?p=553#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>yes kula, anything with calories = for fatass americans. eating disordered much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes kula, anything with calories = for fatass americans. eating disordered much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2007/07/22/the-real-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 02:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/?p=553#comment-1090</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m doina project on this for design at school, and I think that the new design is indeed eyecatching. The older design is a little complicated. In my design class, simple equals good work, but it does have to be creative. The new design isn&#039;t all that creative. I have a mixed opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m doina project on this for design at school, and I think that the new design is indeed eyecatching. The older design is a little complicated. In my design class, simple equals good work, but it does have to be creative. The new design isn&#8217;t all that creative. I have a mixed opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nwabisa lengs</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2007/07/22/the-real-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>nwabisa lengs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 05:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/?p=553#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>hello i want a picture of a can of coke,recycled or not still okay.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello i want a picture of a can of coke,recycled or not still okay&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kula bácsi</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2007/07/22/the-real-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>Kula bácsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/?p=553#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>Coke (and Pepsi of course) is sugared horse urine for fatass Americans so WTF cares what&#039;s on the can of this swine sweat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coke (and Pepsi of course) is sugared horse urine for fatass Americans so WTF cares what&#8217;s on the can of this swine sweat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Orange&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Coca-Cola, Welcome Back to the 60&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2007/07/22/the-real-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-1089</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Orange&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Coca-Cola, Welcome Back to the 60&#8217;s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 11:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/?p=553#comment-1089</guid>
		<description>[...] Welcome back to the 60&#8217;s: The can is now a simple field of red with the Coca-Cola logo popped out in white. No drop shadows, no fake drops of water, nothing. In addition, the soda’s “Classic” text has gone from a formal, stuffy serif treatment to a modern, simple sans-serif face that expertly compliments the new logo. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Welcome back to the 60&#8217;s: The can is now a simple field of red with the Coca-Cola logo popped out in white. No drop shadows, no fake drops of water, nothing. In addition, the soda’s “Classic” text has gone from a formal, stuffy serif treatment to a modern, simple sans-serif face that expertly compliments the new logo. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bud</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2007/07/22/the-real-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator>bud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/?p=553#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>It has to be called Classic, because it is not the real thing, which uses cane sugar, it is the fake recalled by popular demand &quot;Classic&#039;, post New Coke, which was all just a wiggle to get out of bottling contracts that insisted on Sugar being used in Syrup for a product called Coke or Coca-Cola.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has to be called Classic, because it is not the real thing, which uses cane sugar, it is the fake recalled by popular demand &#8220;Classic&#8217;, post New Coke, which was all just a wiggle to get out of bottling contracts that insisted on Sugar being used in Syrup for a product called Coke or Coca-Cola.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Purveyor of Iniquities &#187; links for 2007-07-24</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2007/07/22/the-real-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>Purveyor of Iniquities &#187; links for 2007-07-24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/?p=553#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>[...] The Real Thing The can is now a simple field of red with the Coca-Cola logo popped out in white. No drop shadows, no fake drops of water, nothing. I (tags: design coke) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Real Thing The can is now a simple field of red with the Coca-Cola logo popped out in white. No drop shadows, no fake drops of water, nothing. I (tags: design coke) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2007/07/22/the-real-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-1047</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/?p=553#comment-1047</guid>
		<description>[...] The Real Thing [image] Notice anything different on the soda aisle of your local grocery store? Fans of Coca-Cola and graphic design [&#8230;] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Real Thing [image] Notice anything different on the soda aisle of your local grocery store? Fans of Coca-Cola and graphic design [&#8230;] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2007/07/22/the-real-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/?p=553#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s something wrong with touting the typeface of the the word &quot;Classic&quot; as being &quot;modern&quot;, don&#039;t you think?

I think I would have preferred a serif typeface and a shadow on/under the main logotype, myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s something wrong with touting the typeface of the the word &#8220;Classic&#8221; as being &#8220;modern&#8221;, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>I think I would have preferred a serif typeface and a shadow on/under the main logotype, myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: januarys</title>
		<link>http://gedblog.com/2007/07/22/the-real-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-1052</link>
		<dc:creator>januarys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gedblog.com/?p=553#comment-1052</guid>
		<description>complicated does not always equal modern</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>complicated does not always equal modern</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

